logo

60 pages 2 hours read

Wifedom: Mrs. Orwell's Invisible Life

Nonfiction | Biography | Adult | Published in 2023

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Nature of Invisible Labor

Anna Funder observes that the labor that goes into maintaining a household has traditionally fallen to the wife and stresses that such labor is often overlooked and treated as mundane rather than important or useful. Funder argues that the necessary labor inherent in managing the domestic sphere has historically been delegated to women and remains grossly undervalued by society. The invisibility of such domestic work is one of the primary connections between Funder and Eileen; although they both in different times, with different professions and different marital expectations, the one continuous thread is the invisibility of the domestic labor that wives and mothers provide to their families.

Funder’s experience as a wife and mother shapes her interpretation of Eileen’s life and relationships. She says that “despite Craig and I imagining we divided the work of life and love equally, the world had conspired against our best intentions. I’d been doing the lion’s share for so long we’d stopped noticing” (10). The invisible labor of life is what she had largely taken upon herself: the appointments, the shopping trips, the planning of vacations and meals, and the effort to ensure that all the household chores were done. Even though she and her husband both work for their financial security and he performs a variety of household tasks, the invisible load of caretaking has fallen largely on her. When she talks to her friends who are also wives and mothers, they have similar stories. Although society has changed, supposedly empowering women beyond the role of homemaker, Funder discovers that she and her professional women friends are still overwhelmed by invisible domestic labor.

Along with providing a significant amount of financial support to her small family, Eileen also performs all the domestic labor for Orwell. Their first months of marriage in the cottage demonstrate that she is solely responsible for the cleaning, the cooking, and the animal caretaking, and she even runs the shop to supplement their income. When the outhouse overflows, she is expected to deal with it because the task disgusts Orwell too much. Likewise, when he leaves for Spain, she must stay behind to arrange for the care of the goats and chickens. When he gets sick with tuberculosis, she is responsible for arranging his medical care and maintaining the cottage. She edits his drafts, safeguards the scraps of observations in Spain, smuggles his manuscript out of Barcelona, and ensures that all his drafts are typeset on time. However, she barely appears in his writing, and he never acknowledges the massive amount of labor she provided to support him and his endeavors. This egregious omission is echoed in the biographies that deliberately ignore Eileen’s pivotal role in Orwell’s life. Although feminism has improved the lives of women in many ways—granting the right to vote, extended property rights, the freedom to divorce, a certain degree of reproductive control, and increased access to professional achievements—the fundamental role that women have always filled remains ignored. Funder’s goal in writing this book is to expose the fact that women’s domestic labor is largely ignored; ultimately, she wants to ensure that such labor is given value and attention in a supposedly more progressive world.

The Schism Between Writer and Person

A common question in society and literary criticism alike is whether the art and the artist can be separated. Many writers and artists behave badly, either by dint of historical differences in culture or because they are insulated by their genius or celebrity. The societal reaction is either to ignore the behavior or to denigrate the art as an extension of the artist’s personal life. Funder addresses this question directly by discussing Orwell’s genius while refusing to ignore his moral failures. She pushes the question further by connecting her own experience as an author and her own imperfections to those of Orwell and Eileen.

Funder’s response to the question of whether art and artist are separable is more subtle than the either/or options available. By connecting her own authorial experiences to Orwell’s and acknowledging the challenge of the reader’s demands on an author, she shows that it is essentially impossible for an author’s own life to reflect the polish of their finished work. She therefore credits Orwell’s ideas and artistry throughout the book while taking a critical approach to the ways in which he failed Eileen and abused other women. At the end of the book, Funder makes sure to include an acknowledgement of the genius in Orwell’s writing, along with anecdotes that show his generosity and a considered narrative that exposes his problematic treatment of women. Her desire to “find a way to hold them all – work, man and wife – in a constellation” (23) leads her to draw a line between the writer and the man while simultaneously holding both versions of him accountable for his actions.

There are three writers in this book: Funder, Orwell, and most prominently, Eileen. Funder uses Eileen’s letters as a direct line to Eileen’s writing style and experiences, allowing her voice to dominate much of the narrative. Funder also quotes Eileen’s friends and Orwell’s publishers and editors to demonstrate that Eileen’s writing and artistic instincts seriously influenced all of Orwell’s most famous and successful works. By embracing Eileen’s writing, Funder finds the woman that has been hidden by the writing of men. The schism between writer and human is less severe in Eileen, perhaps in large part because she never aspired to be a “FAMOUS WRITER” (32), but only seeks to support valuable writing. Funder’s willingness to engage the schism between writer and person argues for a more multifaceted approach to moral questions, especially when they involve art that can improve the world.

How Fiction and Truth Overlap

Funder’s choice to craft this book as a combination of primary sources, factual relation of events, and fictional interpretations reinforces and reflects the connections between truth and fiction. In speculative fiction like Orwell’s 1984 and Animal Farm, the fictional elements shine a spotlight on the ideological, human, or philosophical truth within the work. Thus, even if Funder’s interpretation of Eileen’s feelings and thoughts in the fictionalized sections of the book are not strictly true, they still reflect a truth of Eileen’s experience that can be connected to larger societal truths for wives and women.

Speculative fiction imagines an alternate world and uses that world to intensify or clarify a specific message. For example, Orwell’s Animal Farm is a satirical fable in which farm animals rebel against human beings, and although they succeed, they become just as bad as the humans were before them. The message that absolute power corrupts absolutely is intensified because of the fictionalized setting of the novel. The novel was also intended to be veiled criticism of Stalinist Communism during World War II. Orwell originally wanted to write a nonfiction essay, but Eileen convinced him to write it as fiction instead. The underlying truth that Orwell expresses in the book is also more universal because the fiction is timeless, while a nonfiction essay on the topic would have been constrained by factual context.

Likewise, Funder’s choice to create fictionalized scenes rather creating a nonfiction account of her research into Eileen’s life allows for a depth of emotional truth that would otherwise be inaccessible. The main flaw with the biographies and nonfiction accounts of Orwell and Eileen’s life together is the fact that they either ignore Eileen or fail to bring her to life. Funder therefore has a dual purpose in writing the book; she aims to accurately depict Eileen’s life and to expose the systems in literature that ignore women and discount make their contributions. The scenes that Funder creates around Eileen’s letters and various accounts of her life are not strictly true. Instead, they represent Funder’s interpretations, based on her knowledge and analysis of Eileen’s life and work. However, whether Eileen really wondered if she was disappearing into Orwell’s work is inconsequential. The truth expressed in Funder’s scenes is the irrefutable fact that Eileen was indeed disappearing into her husband’s identity, just as many women disappear into the invisible labor of maintaining a family and household for their husbands. Although fiction and truth are typically treated as polar opposites, Funder shows that fiction can reveal the truths that real life tends to obscure. By using fiction to create an emotional life for Eileen and to celebrate the woman’s accomplishments, Funder brings Eileen to life and exposes the many difficult truths that she discovers in her search for Eileen’s identity.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 60 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools