logo

31 pages 1 hour read

The Problem of Pain

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1940

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Reason for Pain

The central question of The Problem of Pain is why Christians believers suffer if their God is a good and benevolent God. Lewis goes to great lengths to examine the nature of suffering—its sterility (meaning its absence of lingering aftereffects), its role in teaching us empathy, how we cause pain on one another (as a result of the free will we have been granted by God), and how some suffering comes to those who, outwardly, seem not to deserve any suffering at all.

All suffering, and thus pain, Lewis argues, has a purpose that God has ordained. One purpose of pain is to remind us that we are only human, and only God is, or could be, omniscient (all-knowing) and omnipotent (all-powerful). This is the lesson of the doctrine of the Fall, in which Adam, the first human, chooses to be disobedient to God and eats fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. As a result of Adam’s choice, all humans are separated from God, but both God and humans desire to be reinstated in close union once more.

Therefore, God sends us pain (as well as moments of joy and happiness, but these are temporary). This pain causes us to seek God for guidance and relief, which reminds us that we do not have everything that we need if we do not have a relationship with God. We are dependent on God, pain tells us, because our own free will is insufficient and inadequate to handle pain alone. Thus, pain has a corrective and instructional purpose, the end result of which is union with God in heaven.

According to Lewis, pain also molds us to be a more perfect version of God’s creation. He uses an analogy that frequently appears in scripture: God is the artist, and humans are his artwork. Humans are the clay to God’s molding hands. Pain is a “megaphone” that helps shape the clay of humanity so that it more closely resembles God’s design. Lewis uses people who are content in their lives—those who have wealth and families—as an example; while these people feel they need nothing else, they don’t have a close relationship with God and will thus need some form of pain to redirect their paths.

Free Will

In creating humankind, Lewis believes that God granted each of us free will; that is, the intellectual freedom to choose a course of action for ourselves. Oftentimes, Lewis says, we exercise this free will in ways that are not beneficial to ourselves (addiction, for instance) or to others (dishonesty, for example). In doing so, we mimic the choice made by Adam in the Garden of Eden when he chose to disobey God, resulting in Adam and Eve’s banishment from Eden and the unity between God and mankind being forevermore destroyed.

Free will, as Lewis describes it, is both the gift to mankind and our ultimate torment. While God gave it to humanity as a means to foster a relationship, free will allowed the Fall and the separation of man and God. Lewis says that evil men desire freedom from God, but in seeking this freedom, they sentence themselves to eternal slavery in hell. Conversely, those who give up their souls and free will to do only the will of God find themselves eternally free in heaven: “[Those in hell] enjoy forever the horrible freedom they have demanded and are therefore self-enslaved: just as the blessed, forever submitting to obedience, become through all eternity more and more free” (81).

Lewis intentionally doesn’t answer the glaring question of why God allows his creation free will when he believes we overwhelmingly use it to do ourselves and others harm. He states that that’s not the question he has decided to address in this book, denoting either a too-lengthy answer or some uncertainty. As free will is one major cause of pain, and thus the “problem” Lewis is addressing, this omittance stands out.

Ultimately, if we are to achieve the purpose God created us for, which is to occupy a place in heaven that has been specifically crafted for us, we must learn to consider God’s will above our own and act accordingly, Lewis argues. Pain serves to remind us that our free will is not infallible, and that we often choose poorly, because we neglect to seek and prioritize God’s will.

Pain as Guidance and a Deepening Relationship with God

Lewis believes that God, who created the Earth and each of us, is wholly good. Furthermore, Lewis says, God loves us in a way that is profound. This love compels God to want the best for us, which means redemption and restoration to right relationship with God, because that is what every soul seeks. Thus, God’s love for humans is not a hands-off type of love, but rather an interactive love that sees our flaws and shortcomings and intervenes to help us repair them. Lewis compares this to the love of a father for a son or a husband for a wife, in that the authority figure in the relationship truly wants only the very best for the other and is willing to do whatever is necessary to help the other better him or herself.

The core argument of the book is that God, in his love and desire for a deeper relationship with us, corrects us. These corrections often result in pain, but that pain is not evidence of God’s disinterest or lack of caring, but just the opposite: The pain is proof that God loves us enough to take an active interest in each human being and do what is necessary to get our attention and remind us, again and again, that in order to be truly joyous, we must place God’s will above our own. Contrary to being evidence of a callous or uncaring God, pain is proof that God deeply loves and cares for each of us.

Lewis uses a biblical reference to describe the way God shapes his creation through pain: “Yet, O Lord, You are our Father and we are the clay, You are the potter; we are all the work of your hand.” Lewis continues this analogy throughout the book, considering God an artist who lovingly shapes His creation with the tools He has at his disposal, pain being the most prominent of these. Considering God as an artist who is never pleased with His craft until it is a representation of His will reveals a more nurturing and loving perception of God. Pain doesn’t mean God doesn’t love His creation, it means that He isn’t finished giving it the best form possible.

This concept of pain as guidance isn’t unique to the Christian world. Many modern ideas of creation and art suggest that the creator “harness” any past or current traumas for the sake of their future endeavors. For example, playwright August Wilson (1945-2005) said, “Use the pain as fuel, as a reminder of your strength.” Wilson famously wrote plays that chronicled the pain so prevalent in the African American experience.

The Existence of Heaven and Hell

Lewis explores how heaven and hell are understood and represented in both the sacred and secular worlds, and he argues that both heaven and hell do exist. Heaven, he says, should not be misconstrued as a bribe or some sort of carrot on a stick that urges humans to behave. Rather, he says, heaven is the ultimate goal of those who are pure at heart and seek God; heaven is where we are redeemed, restored, and reunited with God, which is the source of true and everlasting joy. Hell, on the other hand, is separation from God. It is the result of continually exercising our free will rather than seeking God’s will. Lewis frames the two as the direct opposite of what a person seeks on earth: if a person seeks freedom from God’s will on earth, they will receive eternal slavery in the afterlife. If a person seeks the will of God on earth, they will receive eternal freedom in heaven—a place which they were made to fit into like a glove.

Lewis argues that pain is the corrective measure that reorients us towards heaven because it reminds us that our experiences here on earth are transitory and temporary, that we are incapable of enduring extreme pain without God, and that our true focus should be on aligning ourselves with God rather than with the false gods of ego and vanity, for instance.

Lewis notes that he hates the concept of hell, but he believes that the Bible confirms that it’s real. He adds that Christianity cannot exist without heaven and hell because they are foundational to Christian doctrine. He’s likely refuting Christian Universalism, a concept that appeared as early as 1785. The Christian Universalists believe that all humans have already been saved, and many disbelieve in hell.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 31 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools