logo

54 pages 1 hour read

The Daughter of Doctor Moreau

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2022

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Parental Abuse and Oppression

In The Daughter of Doctor Moreau, Montgomery, Carlota, and to some extent, the hybrids, are all abused and harmed by parental figures, creating a nuanced exploration of the impact of parent-child relationships characterized by abuse and oppression rather than love and support. The pattern of parental abuse in the novel underscores the coming-of-age journey between Innocence and Experience by highlighting the characters’ need to develop independent and autonomous identities when they cannot rely on their parents to be sources of care or safety. However, even beyond the development of independent adult identities, the impact of parental abuse and oppression remains. Even as a grown man, Montgomery is haunted by memories of his cruel and abusive father; he can clearly recall “his father’s insidious beatings” (17). These childhood experiences play a significant role in the cynical worldview that Montgomery develops, and contribute to his tendency toward self-punishment and his problematic relationship with alcohol. Even though Montgomery escaped from his abusive parent, he continues to be impacted and haunted by those events. Montgomery’s self-loathing is likely also rooted in how he did not grow up receiving love and care.

In addition to physical violence, the novel positions deception and manipulation as equally harmful forms of parental abuse. While Montgomery was openly abused and harmed by his father, Carlota initially feels a close and loving bond with her father, to the point that she considers him “like the sun in the sky, lighting her days” (104). Over time, Carlota discovers that her father has been lying to her for years. Moreau conceals Carlota’s hybrid identity and leads her to believe that she requires specialized medical treatment from him—lies that allow him to dominate her and keep her subservient to his wishes. When she eventually learns the truth, Carlota accuses him of “trying to maintain [her and other hybrids] docile and quiet” (237). Moreau’s cruelty is rooted in his belief in his own superiority and the idea that because he created them, he is entitled to total control over Carlota and the other hybrids. He describes Carlota to Montgomery as, “a project. That is what a child is, Laughton: one great project” (159). Moreau’s arrogance reveals how parental abuse and oppression can be rooted in parent’s inability to see their child as a separate entity—a person rather than a possession.

At the end of the novel, the characters ultimately find freedom and achieve autonomy by extricating themselves from parental relationships. The hybrids make the difficult decision to leave Yaxaktun, the only home they have ever known. Carlota is saddened but ultimately liberated by the death of her father; her autonomy and independence are further cemented when she gives up using the Moreau family name. As she explains, “I’ve only ever been the ‘the doctor’s daughter,’ but I feel as if I may now be someone else and chart my path” (300). Throughout Moreno-Garcia’s novel, parents (or parental figures) consistently fail to provide nurturing care to their offspring, and individuals are best served by choosing their own path and their own identity. 

Power and Domination Over the Vulnerable

Moreno-Garcia constructs a plot that highlights the abuse of power and the exploitation of the marginalized inherent in the European colonization of Mexico, allowing her to interrogate the misogyny and racism characteristic of oppressive systems of power. Throughout the novel, individuals in a position of authority consistently exploit those over whom they hold power. Moreau exploits both the hybrids and his daughter, while Hernando Lizalde exploits anyone who works for him. These specific examples point to a broader, systemic pattern of control and exploitation. Early on in the plot, Montgomery muses that “he’d spied the same misery [of oppression] under a different guise […] there was always someone with a little more money, a little more power, and he owned you” (40-41). The novel presents power and dominance as having both economic and racialized roots, especially in an era when slavery and indentured labor were still in the process of being abolished. However, through Carlota’s arc, the novel also highlights the power disparity related to gender. Moreau believes that he deserves subservience from Carlota both because she is a hybrid and a young woman, and from the rest of the hybrids because they are not fully human. The hybrids function as an allegory for the oppression of marginalized groups viewed as sub-human by the majority identity throughout human history into the present.

While power and dominance in the novel are often asserted through physical force, that oppression is reinforced by manipulation, lies, fear-mongering, indoctrination, gaslighting, and coercion. Moreau leads Carlota and the hybrids to believe they need specialized medical treatment from him lest they experience intense pain or death. He also encourages religious practices and dogma that teach obedience and deference, allowing the hybrids to conflate him with a divine entity. As Montgomery cynically observes, “the alcohol [keeps] them pliant, the medicine [keeps] them loyal, the sermons [burn] the rules into their minds, and the hut ensure[s] misdeeds [are] quickly corrected” (125). Doctor Moreau wields the affection that Carlota and the hybrids feel for him as a tool to keep them vulnerable. Significantly, Moreau does not hate the hybrids that he exploits; he genuinely believes he is doing right by them. Acting as an oppressor of the vulnerable is presented as a process—a practice that takes on its own force, infecting even someone who begins with benign intentions, rendering intent irrelevant. The novel suggests that for Moreno-Garcia’s characters, justice can only be achieved through autonomy and self-determination. The hybrid community that Carlota aspires to establish at the end of the novel has the potential to be a good and fair place because no one will be unfairly elevated to a position of privilege. Carlota’s ideology takes on particular relevance within the historical context of European colonization, offering a critique of inequitable and exploitative systems of power.

Innocence and Experience

In Moreno-Garcia’s novel, Carlota’s coming-of-age arc reflects her journey from innocence to experience, demonstrating that the loss of innocence is both painful and necessary to establishing independence and autonomy. Until she reaches the age of 20, Carlota lives a sheltered life in a place she views as paradise. Her father takes pains to shield her from any significant struggles or difficulties, and she claims to be blissfully happy as a result. Reflecting on her relationship with Montgomery, Carlota observes that “she like[s] Montgomery because he [is] part of her world and she love[s] everything in it” (68). While Carlota’s life of innocence seems idyllic in many ways, her happiness is predicated on a lie that renders her vulnerable to exploitation and control. Carlota can readily be seduced and manipulated by Eduardo because she has become so trusting, and has never had to think critically. In fact, her father explicitly encourages her compliance by tying it to her physical health, telling her “to be gentle and serene and avoid exerting yourself physically” (153)—a particularly insidious and calculated attempt at control since Carlota is far more physically powerful than Doctor Moreau when she accesses her hybrid strength and identity.

While Carlota’s innocence gives her some fleeting pleasure, it ultimately relies on the suppression of her true identity and power. When she loses her innocence, she experiences deep sadness but also accesses her true inner strength. Carlota is forced to eventually concede that her father was not a good man, and she commits to taking responsibility for the many cruel acts he perpetuated. She has regrets about no longer being the innocent girl who did not know anything about cruel realities, but she can also act much more autonomously, and in ways that align with her true values. By contrast, Montgomery’s experience serves as a foil to Carlota’s innocence. Because of his abusive childhood, Montgomery lost his innocence from a very young age; he also traveled widely, experiencing varied places and cultures. Montgomery tends to be cynical because of his experiences, but he is also more realistic and can gauge threats much more accurately than Carlota can. Their contrasting dynamics of innocence and experience reflect how these two states are intertwined and dynamic.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 54 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools