51 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
Mortality primarily features in this story as an antagonist. Though the disaster itself is relentless in demonstrating the impermanence of human life, burying “more than twenty thousand human beings” in its earliest moments (Paragraph 2), the death itself soon becomes so extensive and inescapable that it exhibits its own momentum. Azucena cannot be pulled from the mud pit, in part, because “the bodies of her brothers and sisters” cling to her legs (Paragraph 8). This portrait of the living Azucena beleaguered and trapped by the corpses of her family characterizes mortality as a constant, persistent interloper in the realm of the living. So too does the very presence of the countless other corpses in the mire. In the hours that follow the disaster, decomposing bodies contaminate the clay; the decaying masses threaten the living with potential epidemics. Death here appears as an entity that builds upon itself, so discontented with simply making its presence known in the realm of the living that it actively propagates itself.
If Rolf embodies the everlasting human aversion to death, “determined to snatch” the young girl from her own demise (Paragraph 10), then Azucena exhibits a more traditionally Christian perspective on mortality. In her initial resignation to her fate, Azucena stands for the peace that Judeo-Christian religions believe those who have passed after a long bout of suffering experience, as well as the more elusive peace said to exist for the bereaved. Mortality is also closely entwined with Catholicism specifically, and the explicit moments of Catholic tradition in the text reflect not only the onlookers' waning hope that Azucena will survive this ordeal but also the broader human trajectory of life to death.
The narrator introduces us to Azucena by noting that her name is a “first communion” name (Paragraph 1). In Roman Catholicism, First Communion is a tradition wherein a person takes the Lord’s Supper, yeastless bread and wine, for the first time. It occurs for children at the age of reason (between seven and ten), when they can presumably understand the weight of their commitment and the depth of Jesus Christ’s sacrifice. As Azucena is 13, she is above the age of reason and presumably all the more mature for it. The immediate mention of First Communion therefore places Azucena within the context of understanding death and life. As First Communion is also a rite of passage that occurs in the earliest stages of a person’s life, its mention ties Azucena closely to the birth element of the birth-death cycle. This association aligns with the story's earliest depictions of her plight as a recoverable one. When religion crops up again later, in the form of the priest who prays for Azucena's soul and places the token of the Virgin Mary around her neck, the overall impression of those around Azucena is that she is not long for their world.
A common conception of humanity’s place in the natural world is as a unilaterally and irredeemably destructive force. Though humanity’s impact on the world that surrounds us is undeniable—and, indeed, sometimes ruinous—Allende’s story presents the actions of humankind and nature in lockstep just as frequently as she presents them in conflict. Rather than embodying a scourge-victim dichotomy, humans and natural forces react in similar ways to changes in their surroundings.
In the immediate aftermath of the disaster, there is an express focus on the “desolate” look in Azucena’s eyes (Paragraph 6). This term implies a forced emptiness—a destruction of what once was and the entry of a trauma-induced bareness. The emotional vacancy in Azucena’s face is the logical product of enduring the deaths of all who once knew her: In the wake of her loss, there is the double-pronged absence of both her visible emotion and her literal relatives and acquaintances. The individual desolation that Azucena represents mirrors the desolation the mudslide imposes on the natural environment that surrounds her. The mud, after swallowing all villages, townspeople, and vegetation in its path, turns to quicksand that not only gives the area the appearance of a desert but also necessitates a degree of absence. The mudslide makes it impossible for any potential rescuer to reach Azucena, keeping the area that immediately surrounds her barren of detectable life: “[A]nyone attempting to reach her was in danger of sinking” (Paragraph 6). This is a moment where the area itself, by furthering Azucena’s loneliness, keeps its desolation and Azucena’s in terrible, perfect sync. Figuratively, the isolation also hints at the impossibility of real empathy in the wake of extreme tragedy, since the people the mud keeps physically at bay are also those for whom Azucena’s suffering is a spectacle.
The significance that Azucena assigns to the natural world’s caprices makes this relationship all the worse; when it begins to rain, she personifies the sky and notes that it “is weeping” (Paragraph 19). She begins to cry herself, demonstrating her own deep-seated emotional identification with the rainfall. While this scene furthers the parallel between Azucena and the natural world (the narrative alludes to her head sprouting from the mud like a plant), it also demonstrates her innocence; describing rainfall as tears is the sort of uncomplicated yet obliquely profound observation a child might make. Additionally, the “weeping” that Azucena points out furthers the personification of the natural world by assigning to it not pain, but one of the most common manifestations of pain-processing: palliative grieving. The interconnectedness of the human and natural worlds turns the sky’s manifest “sadness” into an emotion that may apply to either the calamitous loss of life or the lamentable destruction of the mountain face itself (perhaps even both). This heightened environmental empathy also makes the failures of human-to-human empathy in the story all the more glaring; the emotional resonance that exists between Azucena and the landscape is largely inaccessible to those who witness the tragedy, and who instead simply project their own emotions onto it.
In its earliest iteration in the narrative, memory appears as an element of agency. It allows characters to exercise a control over their own psychic territories that stands counter to the lack of control they have over the chaotic world around them. In the story’s opening pages, the narrator does not provide any specific memories of Rolf’s demeanor, but her observations of his optimism, compassion, and sorrow as he attempts to save Azucena are informed by her past interactions with him: “[E]ven from that enormous distance I could sense the quality of his weariness, so different from the fatigue of other adventures” (Paragraph 18). It is this understanding of him, borne of her implied recollections of his typical behavior, that allows her to track his trajectory throughout the ordeal, even as her attempts to organize rescue efforts for Azucena prove frustrating, confusing, and eventually fruitless. Her memories of Rolf serve as her point of sense in a seemingly senseless climate. Similarly, for Azucena, combing through her own memories with Rolf allows her a freedom of mental movement even as any sort of physical agility proves impossible for her. The sharing of her memories also allows her to establish the level of familiarity at which she interacts with Rolf, enabling her to steer this one element of her world in any way she so chooses.
While memory begets agency, it also reveals itself to be restrictive, as there is no true way for a person to exit their own mind. Rolf helplessly recalls the worst moments of his past, and the instances of warped familial intimacy that come to him prove that memories of human interconnection are relentless even when the connections themselves were ruinous. This makes Rolf’s preoccupation with the future more understandable. While Azucena returns to her memories of a life spent in her village, Rolf imagines a detailed future for her. For a young Rolf, brought up in an abusive home, the future held a lightness and space that his life made it impossible to fully imagine. Nevertheless, his attempts to visualize this future marked the first step in his eventual flight from his dire circumstances. His imagining a future for Azucena may be an attempt at sharing the same with the young girl, psychologically setting her on the path for escape.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Isabel Allende